Muslims, shouldn't they register like FORMER sex offenders do? - what does ww mean japanese
Trained the man who fired all the soldiers and so much for our country, but those who killed are trained to protect.
I mean, why are we to help these guys? I am a former (soldier of 12 years) and as a sex offender (minor) and must register.
Why does not the idea with Muslim or Middle East have to register? Imagine, a national security measure.
It is not registered as a punishment for sex offenders after they have paid for their crimes. Why not terrorists (or suspected terrorists)?
It is not like WW-2 and the Japanese in concentration camps. Are they in a directory is everything. It's nothing personal (well, after the Supreme Court) in relation to the statement of objections. For security reasons.
9 comments:
Sorry, but that will not happen. Feelings of the people always come before national security.
No unconstitutional. You know, this was a man, and there are thousands of murders in the United States each year and most murderers do not Muslims but Christians.
They were convicted of a crime.
There are millions of Muslims in the United States do not commit crimes and have never been a crime has been convicted.
You are absolutely right.
When Timothy McVeigh should have been obliged, as a white person was (register also a decorated veteran of the Army, was in the Gulf War).
******* Idiot ...
Sex offenders who have committed a crime. Exactly what crime I had committed Muslim neighbors (and not in addition to the white or Christian)?
Not every Muslim is a terrorist or a terrorist, or even want to be a terrorist or terrorist ideologies.
It is however a sexual predator. Your opinion is canceled.
Religious freedom is a right in this country. This includes Islam
Of course!
And whites should be able to keep the wives and daughters as sex slaves.
To do from now on if I want to say, or something stupid
... I think that only you feel and look a lot smarter
Thank you
Sex offenders opinions always matter: D
Read the Constitution, the Engineering racist.
Absolutely not. The list of sex offenders means that one has committed a crime. Has a record that only someone who can not be compared by a member of the religion apples to apples, last thing I checked, no crime to be Muslim. Also going against the First and Fourteenth Amendments because they violate the freedom of religion and presenting to a group of people to unequal treatment, who have not committed a crime or something illegal.
Her case is not comparing apples with apples, because they have been convicted or guilty or no competition in a crime.
As for the Japanese concentration camps, the United States was wrong and stopped the payment of reparations in 1988, because of it.
Post a Comment